Auditors ✓ Lawyers ✓ Tax advisors ✓ and business consultants ✓ : Four perspectives. One solution. Worldwide. Learn …
Auditing and audit-related advice for companies ✓ Experienced auditors ✓ Excellent advice ✓ Tailor-made solutions » …
Our clients entrust us with their most important legal matters. Learn more about our legal services!
Tax laws are complex and dynamic. We face the challenge of tax law together with you - find out more.
Business consulting for companies ✓ Experienced consultants ✓ Excellent advice ✓ Tailor-made solutions » more
EU’s 21st Sanctions Package Against Russia: What Companies Need to Know Now
Baker Tilly Strengthens Mid-Market Tax Advisory with Markus Krinninger
Return of Registered Mail with Delivery Confirmation? DHL Changes Delivery Procedure
Baker Tilly Advises IX Group on Partnership with HTGS
Baker Tilly continues to expand its Real Estate Valuation Services
Baker Tilly advises Capmont on add-on acquisitions in the electrical segment
Baker Tilly Advises Gimborn on the Acquisition of a Majority Stake in Cerberus
Withholding tax refund for EU parent companies with subsidiaries in liquidation
ICT risks when using AI: New BaFin guidance
One year of DORA: What's next for financial companies
Survey: Two thirds of German automotive suppliers anticipate a market shakeout
Cross-industry expertise for individual solutions ✓ Our interdisciplinary teams combine expertise & market …
Baker Tilly advises CERTANIA on the Acquisition of InnoDiab
New SGEI Decision: Key Changes at a Glance
SGEI Decision: New Funding Opportunities for Affordable Housing
Risk management ✓ Compliance and controls ✓ Increase and ensure security & conformity ✓ more»
Baker Tilly offers a wide range of individual and innovative consulting services. Find out more!
In its decision of February 14, 2025 (case no. 6 U 12/24), the Karlsruhe Higher Regional Court ruled that the planning sovereignty of the municipalities and their right to specify the objectives under energy industry law can justify the consideration of a tender’s content without this having to be explicitly communicated in advance.
The transparency requirement did not require the local authority to break down all material aspects it wishes to take into account in the evaluation of tenders down to the last detail in advance. This applied at least if the aspects listed in order to explain the selection criteria are not an exhaustive list, but rather present the central aspects from the municipality’s point of view. This was a necessary consequence of the fact that the bidding competition’s openness in terms of content gives the applicants scope to introduce their own new aspects. In this respect, the transparency requirement – if the tender allows the bidders the freedom to present their own concepts – did not demand that it is clear which services must be offered in order to make the highest rated bid when submitting the tender.
Furthermore, it could generally not be ruled out that the announced evaluation criteria contain terms that need to be filled in, which can only be concretized during the evaluation and classification of the tenders in individual cases – without changing the award criteria or their weighting – and thus require qualitative evaluations in their application. Such terms could not be avoided if the invitation to tender contains open-ended elements. This was not inadmissible from the point of view of transparency, as long as the bidders are able to recognize which requirements must be fulfilled, in particular which aspects of a bid are evaluated positively.
The decision presented above now offers the local authorities issuing tenders more freedom in the selection decision to be made.
If you have any questions in connection with electricity and gas concession selection procedures, please do not hesitate to contact us.
View all news