Auditors, lawyers, tax consultants and management consultants: Four perspectives. One solution. Worldwide. Find out …
We review your past and advise you on the implementation of future requirements and projects. Find out more!
Our clients entrust us with their most important legal matters. Learn more about our legal services!
Tax laws are complex and dynamic. We face the challenge of tax law together with you - find out more.
We support you with customised solutions so that your company can continue to operate successfully on the market in …
Shared service centers in SMEs: structure for greater efficiency
Pillar 2: Mandatory registration in the UK and discussions in the EU Parliament
Accounting vs. tax law: Why more coordination is needed
EU “Omnibus” Package: Less effort for sustainability reporting?
Baker Tilly starts the year 2025 with 23 new Directors
Challenges in corporate finance: Baker Tilly at Structured FINANCE 2024
Pay slips are purely information documents
Financing and funding: realignment in the coalition agreement
Labor and social law: What the new coalition agreement contains
Public procurement: Legally compliant procurement of cyber insurance
Countdown to September – The EU Data Act and its implications
Procurement law – legal framework for emergency procurements in the event of a cyberattack
Industry-specific knowledge is essential in order to create the best conditions for customised solutions. Find out …
Baker Tilly advises biotech startup Real Collagen GmbH investment by US investor
Energy study: Uncertainty slows down investments by industry and utilities in Germany
After ECJ ruling: Financial investors still have no direct access to medical care centers
Benefit from bundled interdisciplinary competencies, expert teams and individual solutions. Learn more!
Baker Tilly offers a wide range of individual and innovative consulting services. Find out more!
The German Federal Labor Court (“BAG”) in Erfurt recently decided that the termination of a medical assistant’s employment who had not been vaccinated against the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in order to protect patients and the rest of the workforce from infection does not violate the prohibition of victimization.
According to such prohibition, the employer may not discriminate against an employee in an agreement or a measure if the employee exercises hir or her rights in a permissible way (Art. 612a BGB (German Civil Code).
The decision was based on the following case:
The plaintiff had worked as medical assistant for the defendant, who operates a hospital, since February 1, 2021. The plaintiff had been assigned to various wards in patient care. She refused to undergo vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 and did not accept her employer’s corresponding offers to get vaccinated.
The defendant terminated the employment with due notice effective August 31, 2021. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against such termination, asserting in particular that the termination violated the prohibition of victimization pursuant to Art. 612a BGB. Before the obligation to present proof of vaccination or proof of recovery for hospital staff (cf. Art. 20a IfSG (German Infection Protection Act)) came into effect on March 15, 2022, she had not been obliged to be vaccinated.
According to the BAG, the refusal to get vaccinated was not the reason for dismissal
The Rhineland-Palatinate Regional Labor Court had dismissed the complaint. The plaintiff’s appeal before the BAG was not successful (BAG, decision of March 30, 2023 – 2 AZR 309/22; BAG press release of March 30, 2023). The court of appeal correctly assumed that the dismissal did not violate the prohibition of victimization pursuant to Art. 612a BGB. The causality required for such violation between the employee’s exercise of rights and the discriminating action by the employer was missing. The essential motive for the employment’s termination was not the plaintiff’s refusal to get vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, but the intention to protect the hospital’s patients and the remaining workforce from getting infected by non-vaccinated medical staff. In this context, it was legally irrelevant that the employment had been terminated before the statutory compulsory vaccination came into effect. Even from a constitutional perspective, there were no concerns regarding the termination’s validity.
Practical advice
In times of and in connection with Covid-19, dismissals may be justified. For example, terminations of employment for operational reasons due to business closures are/were possible. However, this needs to be thoroughly examined. Such terminations are subject to the ordinary provisions under the German Employment Protection Act and not to any extraordinary termination right.
Even if there is currently no obligation to wear masks, to self-isolate and to get vaccinated, the question of legally permitted measures within the course of the Covid-19 pandemic, such as compulsory vaccinations, has not become obsolete yet.
Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions in this context or in connection with any other labor law related issues.
View all news