Auditors, lawyers, tax consultants and management consultants: Four perspectives. One solution. Worldwide. Find out …
We review your past and advise you on the implementation of future requirements and projects. Find out more!
Our clients entrust us with their most important legal matters. Learn more about our legal services!
Tax laws are complex and dynamic. We face the challenge of tax law together with you - find out more.
We support you with customised solutions so that your company can continue to operate successfully on the market in …
Shared service centers in SMEs: structure for greater efficiency
Pillar 2: Mandatory registration in the UK and discussions in the EU Parliament
Accounting vs. tax law: Why more coordination is needed
EU “Omnibus” Package: Less effort for sustainability reporting?
Baker Tilly starts the year 2025 with 23 new Directors
Challenges in corporate finance: Baker Tilly at Structured FINANCE 2024
Pay slips are purely information documents
Financing and funding: realignment in the coalition agreement
Labor and social law: What the new coalition agreement contains
Public procurement: Legally compliant procurement of cyber insurance
Countdown to September – The EU Data Act and its implications
Procurement law – legal framework for emergency procurements in the event of a cyberattack
Industry-specific knowledge is essential in order to create the best conditions for customised solutions. Find out …
Baker Tilly advises biotech startup Real Collagen GmbH investment by US investor
Energy study: Uncertainty slows down investments by industry and utilities in Germany
After ECJ ruling: Financial investors still have no direct access to medical care centers
Benefit from bundled interdisciplinary competencies, expert teams and individual solutions. Learn more!
Baker Tilly offers a wide range of individual and innovative consulting services. Find out more!
Lower Saxony Regional Labor Court: Certificate of incapacity for work’s probative value not compromised by an employee's sick leave until termination of the employment relationship (decision of March 8, 2023, Case No. 8 Sa 859/22)
In the case decided, the plaintiff was initially on sick leave from May 2, 2022 to May 6, 2022. On May 2, 2022 (received by the plaintiff on May 3, 2022), the defendant gave notice of termination as of the end of the month. The plaintiff subsequently submitted two follow-up certificates showing his incapacity for work until the end of the month. The defendant had doubts about the authenticity of the illness and refused to continue to pay wages, as the plaintiff was absent due to illness for the entire remaining period of the employment relationship and already started a new job on June 1, 2022.
The Regional Labor Court emphasized that the certificate of incapacity for work had a high probative value which had not been compromised. In order for the probative value to be compromised, the defendant had to present and prove actual circumstances that give rise to doubts about the plaintiff's illness. The principles set out in the judgment of the Federal Labor Court (Case No. 5 AZR 149/21) were not relevant. The Federal Labor Court had ruled that the probative value of a certificate of incapacity for work was compromised if the certificate of incapacity for work was valid from the day the employee gave notice of termination and the certified incapacity for work covered exactly the duration of the notice period (so-called temporal coincidence). This was different in the case at hand, since the notice of termination had been given by the employer, several certificates of incapacity for work had been submitted and the temporal coincidence was lacking. The plaintiff's incapacity for work had started prior to the termination by the defendant.
The decision shows that the temporal coincidence alone is not sufficient in order to compromise the certificate of incapacity for work’s probative value. Due to the fundamental importance of the case, the appeal was allowed. According to the Regional Labor Court, the fact that the plaintiff had regained health at the start of his new job could justify a different assessment. It remains to be seen how the Federal Labor Court will rule on the matter.
View all news